NeoGRC exists because teams are asked to prove how a changing rule reached a control, an owner, a decision and evidence—while conventional systems preserve each part in isolation.
The source sits in one place. Obligations are interpreted in another. Policies, controls, evidence and ownership live across spreadsheets and specialised systems. The final decision is difficult to reconstruct.
NeoGRC’s premise is simple: the relationship between these records is itself part of the compliance evidence.
NeoGRC does not yet have public customer case studies or testimonials. The appropriate proof at this stage is inspectable product behaviour: sources, linked records, workflow states, human decisions, security boundaries and retained history.
Follow an official-source change through impact analysis, a human approval decision, controlled updates and a retained review record. All organisations and people shown are illustrative.
Open the regulatory change demoSee how obligations, risks, controls, policies, evidence, actions and audit findings share context without collapsing their distinct ownership and histories.
Explore the connected GRC productExamine the published explanation of tenant-aware access, environment separation, EU data residency, logging, recovery and the controls relevant to multi-client consultancy delivery.
Review security and data isolationRegulatory work begins with the authoritative source, version and applicability context.
Obligations matter because they affect real risks, controls, policies, systems, evidence and people.
Assisted analysis stays staged until a named practitioner makes and explains the decision.
Source, configuration, operational record and human decision histories remain distinguishable.
DORA is the first live proof point; future regulations are labelled honestly until operationally ready.
Delivery is designed to reduce implementation ambiguity. Instead of starting with a broad module rollout, NeoGRC identifies a bounded operating outcome and proves the records, responsibilities and review controls needed to support it.
This method is suitable for an enterprise team introducing connected GRC progressively or a consultancy establishing a repeatable method that can be configured separately for each client.
Start with one regulatory, risk, compliance or audit outcome and identify the people accountable for it.
Map the source, obligations, risks, controls, policies, evidence, actions and assurance relationships needed to explain the outcome.
Set the workflow states, ownership, permissions, approval points and human decisions that must remain attributable.
Walk realistic scenarios, exceptions and hand-offs without requiring production data during initial evaluation.
If there is a practical fit, agree a focused implementation with named owners, acceptance criteria and an explicit route to extend later.
DORA combines governance, ICT risk, incident reporting, resilience testing and third-party oversight. It demands traceability across operational domains, making it a credible first implementation—not the product boundary.
European regulatory sources and accountability shape the operating model.
Connected obligations, impact, review and history.
Privacy processing and accountability structure.
The same operating model extends as the library grows.
NeoGRC can organise regulatory and GRC records, preserve their relationships, route work for review and retain attributable history. Those capabilities help practitioners operate and evidence their process; they do not make regulatory interpretation automatic or remove management accountability.
Product workflows, illustrative records, approval states, audit history, architecture explanations and official regulatory sources.
Applicability, materiality, treatment, acceptance, approval, audit conclusions and other accountable decisions.
Live, in-development and coming-soon capabilities, plus illustrative product data that must not be mistaken for customer evidence.
Automatic compliance, legal advice, unearned certifications, customer outcomes, deployment statistics or guaranteed results.
NeoGRC is developing through direct workflow validation with compliance, risk, technology, privacy, audit and operational-resilience practitioners. We do not invent customer names, partnerships or traction.
Founding Partner ProgrammeNeoGRC is being developed and operated by NeoGRC Solutions Pvt. Ltd. The platform is in early application development, with live DORA and GDPR operating structures used to prove a broader, regulation-agnostic architecture.
Additional regulations are labelled in development or coming soon until their source structures and workflows are genuinely available. Demonstration workspaces use representative data and are never presented as customer deployments.
These answers reflect NeoGRC’s current product-development stage and are updated as operational capabilities change.
NeoGRC is building an EU-first connected governance, risk and compliance platform. Its operating model links regulatory sources and obligations to risks, controls, policies, evidence, actions, audit work and accountable human decisions.
DORA and GDPR structures are the current regulatory proof points, alongside connected Risk Management, Compliance Management and Audit Management workflows. Other regulation modules are labelled in development or coming soon until their operational content is available.
Buyers can inspect the interactive DORA regulatory change review, review annotated product workflows, examine the security and data-isolation explanation, and use a focused demonstration to test one representative operating scenario.
No. NeoGRC supports structured regulatory and GRC work but does not replace legal interpretation or accountable practitioner judgement. Assisted analysis remains subject to human review and approval.
NeoGRC is developed and operated by NeoGRC Solutions Pvt. Ltd., headquartered in Bengaluru, India, with a European regulatory focus and an EU-first product architecture.
