Are we covering the right areas?
A risk-informed audit universe, prioritisation rationale and visible plan coverage.
Live solution
Plan to closure
Audit Management
Build a risk-based audit plan, perform reviewable fieldwork and follow every finding through independent validation and closure.
Risk-based audit planningTraceable fieldworkVerified finding closure
Illustrative workspace shown with representative product data · Aurelia Assurance
Assurance that stands up to review
See what was tested, what was found and what closed.
Audit work becomes harder to defend when the plan, fieldwork, evidence and actions live in separate files. Progress may be reported, but the basis for scope and the path to closure remain difficult to reconstruct.
NeoGRC Audit Management connects the audit universe, risk-based plan, working record, review notes, findings and remediation. Audit leaders can oversee delivery while engagement teams retain the detail needed to support each conclusion.
Can the conclusion be defended?
Tests, samples, evidence and review notes connected to the work performed.
What needs attention?
Engagement progress, review points and findings requiring a decision or response.
Did remediation really close?
Management actions, validation evidence and independent closure decisions.
How audit work moves
One audit operating model, from universe to closure.
The workflow connects portfolio planning with engagement delivery and follow-up. Audit leaders retain oversight without separating the reported position from the work that supports it.
Maintain the audit universe
Define auditable entities and connect them to the processes, services, risks or obligations in scope. Preserve ownership and prior assurance context so planning starts from a current view of the organisation.
Build and approve the plan
Prioritise proposed engagements using risk, change, prior findings and assurance coverage. Record the rationale, resources and approval so additions or deferrals remain transparent.
Scope the engagement
Set objectives, boundaries, criteria, milestones and responsibilities. Connect relevant risks and controls before fieldwork so the team is clear about the assurance question it must answer.
Perform and review fieldwork
Document procedures, samples, results and evidence in context. Route work for review, resolve notes and retain the link between what was tested and the conclusion reached.
Agree and report findings
Develop findings from condition, criteria, cause and consequence. Capture management response, action ownership and target dates while preserving review and approval decisions.
Validate remediation and close
Follow management actions through evidence submission and independent validation. Record whether the issue is closed, extended or risk-accepted rather than treating a completed task as automatic closure.
Fieldwork with traceability
A conclusion should lead back to the work performed.
NeoGRC keeps procedures, samples, evidence, results and review notes together. Engagement teams spend less time reconstructing files, while reviewers can see what was tested and how exceptions affected the conclusion.
- Connect tests and samples to the relevant risk or control
- Keep evidence, exceptions and reviewer notes in context
- Preserve sign-off and changes across the engagement record
From finding to closure
Completion is not the same as verified remediation.
Management actions remain connected to the finding and agreed response. Audit can review the evidence, record the validation result and retain an explicit closure, extension or acceptance decision.
- Finding
- Criteria, condition, cause and consequence
- Response
- Owner, agreed action and target date
- Closure
- Evidence, validation and final decision
A focused working session
See your audit process, not a feature checklist.
Bring one representative engagement, a sample workpaper and a finding that has been difficult to close. We will test the workflow against your methodology, review and reporting needs.
Book an Audit Management demo- 01Map the audit lifecycle
Universe, planning method, roles and approvals.
- 02Walk one engagement
Scope, fieldwork, evidence, review and reporting.
- 03Test the difficult cases
Review notes, scope changes, overdue actions and validation.
- 04Agree a practical next step
A focused scope with owners and success criteria.
Questions buyers ask
Audit Management, in practical terms.
Clear answers for teams evaluating how the solution would support planning, fieldwork and finding closure.
What problem does audit management software solve?
Audit management software provides a controlled workflow for the audit universe, risk-based planning, engagement delivery, evidence, review, reporting and follow-up. It keeps portfolio oversight connected to the work supporting each conclusion.
How does NeoGRC support risk-based audit planning?
Auditable entities can be prioritised using relevant risks, organisational change, prior findings and existing assurance coverage. The plan retains the rationale, resource assumptions and approval history behind coverage decisions.
How are fieldwork and evidence reviewed?
Procedures, samples, results and evidence remain connected within the engagement. Review notes can be raised, resolved and signed off while preserving the record of how the conclusion was reached.
Can existing risks and controls be used in an audit?
Yes. An engagement can reference relevant risks and controls while audit retains its own scope, testing, evidence and independent conclusion. This reduces re-entry without weakening audit ownership.
How does finding closure work?
Management actions can be followed through target dates and evidence submission. Audit then records its validation and makes an explicit decision to close, extend or escalate the finding.
What should we bring to an Audit Management demo?
Bring one representative audit, a sample workpaper or test, and an open finding. The session can then test NeoGRC against your planning, review, reporting and follow-up methodology.
See it with your operating model
Book a focused demo